"the process of defining dynamic quality" implies that DQ is primary..
----- Original Message ---- From: Steven Peterson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 2:16:36 PM Subject: Re: [MD] DMB and Me Hi Matt, > Steve said: > [Quality] is undefined because it is inexhaustably > describable. > > Matt: > This is awesome because it never occurred to me to gloss > Quality's undefinition this way. I've been glossing it as > anti-essence for years, but this takes a big leap forward > (at least in terms of integrating Pirsig and Rorty, which I > don't require everyone to care about). Way to go, Steve. I got it from this LC annotation: RMP: Dynamic Quality is defined constantly by everyone. Consciousness can be described is a process of defining Dynamic Quality. But once the definitions emerge they are static patterns and no longer apply to Dynamic Quality. So one can say correctly that Dynamic Quality is both infinitely definable and undefinable because definition never exhausts it. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
