>Yet we know for a certainty that what is see is not what I see. But what difference does that make? My sight gives me certainty concerning reality and I need nothing more.
> Here is the other side of the matter. Truth remains truth in relation > to > and in spite of everything. It is firm, stable, hard, and irrefutable. > We > must not relativize it just because science has changed. We must not > say > that yesterday's truth becomes today's error. We must not become so > extremely liberal that we say everything is relative, so that one > person can > be just as right as the person who says the opposite. If truth is > truth > even beyond the limits of our grasp and our approximation, it *exists*. > And > that settles it. That settles it? There is an absolute truth out there. We cannot see it, but we should ignore that problem and rely solely on our senses. When my sense experience disagrees with yours, we should not say that truth is relative - meaning I guess that we should stick stubbornly to our own version of the truth and discount everyone else's? > Truth is the absolute or eternal. We are not able even to approach its > outskirts. Meaning we should stick to our lie because it's our lie, but we don't have to grant any accommodation to the next person's. Pretty messed up dude. Wonder what he thinks about compliments? That's my story and I'm gonna stick to it, Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
