[Platt]
Oh yes, if you say so. You are right. You are always right.
[Arlo]
At least I can support what I assert. And am not afraid to do so. Nor
do I rely on such unnecessary obfuscation instead of answering directly.
[Platt]
Of course, you have yet to substantiate your "no" answers.
[Arlo]
You have not asked me any questions. You said "Quality" and "cells"
"have intelligence". You asked if I agree. I said "no". I've asked
you questions to substantiate your claim. You've done nothing but
avoid these questions.
I've already said "cells" are biological patterns, and thus do not
"have intelligence". There are able to respond to DQ only within the
bounds of a biological repertoire of possibility constrained by their
complexity/simplicity.
[Platt]
But never mind. Conversations with you always turn out to be of
little, if any, value, as others here will attest. .
[Arlo]
Pathetic, Platt. I've done nothing but ask you legitimate,
straight-forward questions about YOUR claim. I've not engaged in any
distortions, name-calling or anything of the sort. And all I've been
met with is a series of evasions. And now this.
You should be ashamed.
Really.
[Platt]
Repeating the questions simply shows your attempt to play professor
to a student. Sorry, but I don't chose to play one of your captive
students. It's a waste of my time.
[Arlo]
Well, I think this too makes it quite evident that rather than deal
honestly with questions you CAN'T answer, you'd choose to descend
into this ridiculous rhetoric.
Why is that, Platt? Why is THAT not a waste of your time?
Seriously. The waste of your time SHOULD be to engage in such
rhetoric. And it should be worth your time to face legitimate,
straight-forward questions about your own claims.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
