Dwave and all, I do think dw 15 levels gives a broader, more detailed way of understanding things. And the way the levels interact, their nature, etc. is different from moq. There are some interesting similarities too. They both see a problem with substance and dualism and sol and som. However, again with different interpretations.
The insight into a supra-theortetical apriori behind all thought, centered in the heart of man, in his religious nature is a major insight. "Philosophy is not itself religion, but it is grounded in religion. Philosophic thought is not possible without the activating<http://www.members.shaw.ca/jgfriesen/Definitions/Act.html>of the religious root <http://www.members.shaw.ca/jgfriesen/Definitions/Root.html> of our personality, our selfhood<http://www.members.shaw.ca/jgfriesen/Definitions/Selfhood.html>; it can only be understood as religious activity<http://www.members.shaw.ca/jgfriesen/Definitions/Act.html>of the self in the temporal theoretical domain. This religious activity of the self intensifies itself in philosophic thought, but it definitely transcends thought in its religious fullness<http://www.members.shaw.ca/jgfriesen/Definitions/Fulfillment.html> ." BTW, not selling yet, but I am taking contributions, Jon On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:38 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]>wrote: > > Howdy Moqers: > Here's a little bit of Wiki, just so you know what Jon is selling here. > Following Abraham Kuyper, and other, earlier Neo-Calvinists, Dooyeweerd > attempted to describe reality as a creation of God, which has its meaning > from God. This God-given meaning is displayed in all of the aspects of > temporal reality, which has implications for science. ... He argued that > this showed the need for a consistent and radically Christian philosophy > which he sought to provide. Furthermore, he attempted to show that, even the > imaginations of men are part of that same created reality, and even if false > they cannot escape being subject to the rule of God exposed by the Christian > revelation. Dooyeweerd self-consciously allowed his Christian perspective to > guide his understanding, but in a philosophical rather than a theological > mode of thought. He believed that this permitted the philosopher to gain > insight into the principle by which diversity of meaning is held together as > a unity, as he directs his thought toward the origin of things, which is > God, and God's purpose > for making things, which is found in Christ. This basic religious > orientation... > > > > > Jon said: > > This site, and this artilce, gives a good intro to some basics of DW's > > position on the necessary presuppositions of philosophic thought. It may > > illuminate, or by contrast help define, moq. > > > > http://www.members.shaw.ca/jgfriesen/Mainheadings/Prolegomena2.html > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with > Hotmail. > > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4 > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
