Hmmmm Steve ,,, not really ... I wouldn't / didn't say "the same thing as" that would be a categorical ontological statement about what truth "is".
Justified belief is more useful than truth ... so let's talk about it (instead of "asserting" truth) but we've just shifted the problem to the process(es) of justification ... of one idea, conclusion, decision being "better" than another (vis the Pierce example) Dave is no sissy, and doesn't need my defense, but I doubt that rhetoric .... of what he "thinks / is trying to say / make" as justified = "whatever we feel justified" .... was within a million miles of what he was actually saying. (Jamesian) Radical empiricism is more than the subjective feeling of experiencing justification, but even without that the (Pirsigian) quality we experience is a multi-patterned & many-layered thing. You may have to explain the correspondence theory point to me ... Ian On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Steven Peterson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ian, > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
