On 5/3/10 4:23 AM, "Mary" <[email protected]> wrote: [Mary Replies to Ian] Absolutely agree with that. If the MoQ is about replacing the subject-object split with the static-dynamic split, wouldn't intellectual patterns would fall into that subject-object split category? Mary Hi Mary, I look for ³quietness² that will not disturb people. An objective existence for things and a subjective existence necessary for a functioning mind/will to know and use things, som, are not quiet. Plato¹s, Aristotle¹s metaphysics of S/O as interpreted by Aquinas requires a real objective existence and real intentional subjective existence for knowledge, som, and knowledge creates intelligibility! DQ/SQ, SOL evolution, is a quieter metaphysics. Imho The harmony of the spheres enables the sound of music. Joe
> Hi Ian, > >>> This is where Phaedrus wants us to go (each following our own dharma) >> and >>> this is what he meant when he said 'Kill all intellectual patterns'. >>> > [Mary Replies] > Absolutely agree with that. > > If the MoQ is about replacing the subject-object split with the > static-dynamic split, wouldn't intellectual patterns would fall into that > subject-object split category? > > Mary > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
