Andre, Please provide full quotes for a full explanation.
Marsha On May 6, 2010, at 7:04 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Bodvar to Platt: > > Page up and page down in LILA > Pirsig harps on intellects undermining social control which has resulted > in nightmarish conditions in many big Western cities. Only intellect's > OBJECTIVE OVER SUBJECTIVE attitude that makes morals into > subjective irrelevancies can work this ill effect. I need not repeat all > you fine arguments, but great show. > > Andre: > What tediousness! I have quickly gone over LILA and LILA's Child and Pirsig's > use of subject-object metaphysics. He specifically uses (more often than not > it seems to me) the 'qualifier' 'conventional'. He refers to the > 'conventional subject-object metaphysics'. You two are superimposing this > onto the intellectual level (leaving intact all confusing difficulties > associated with this way of thinking)whilst Pirsig makes it clear that he > didn't need to get rid of them because the MOQ could 'encase them neatly > within its structure- the upper two levels being subjective, and the lower > two, objective. Still later I saw that the subject-object distinction is very > useful for sharply distinguishing between biological and social levels'.(LC, > p 530) > > Continuing to brandish the intellectual level as dominated by SOM intellect > is simply not to understand nor accept the MOQ. > > Bodvar: > I need not repeat all you fine arguments, but great show. > > Andre: > > 'so while you're jerking off eachother...' (John Lennon) > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
