> [Steve]:
> > Necessary to whom? I certainly couldn't do any of the things
> > I want to do without a universe.
Ham said:
> No, nor would you be here without a universe. But your Catholic friend was
> asking for your answer as to "why does anything at all exist?" and you
> called it a "bad question". I pointed out that Heidegger considered it the
> fundamental question of metaphysics.
Matt:
Yeah, and Steve is telling Heidegger he's pissing up the
wrong tree. You say later that neither Steve nor Pirsig
want to "confront metaphysics head-on," but Steve's saying
confronting "metaphysics," as you've construed the discipline,
head-on is like confronting a mist head-on: what you should
do is blow it off to see the ground.
Matt
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
