Before you showed up, Adrie, I said the difference between an atheist and an anti-theist is that an atheist doesn't believe in God whereas an anti-theist is just mad at Him.
But aside from that tongue in cheek evaluation, I agree completely that the MoQ is in a very important regard. anti-theistic. That regard is viewing any particular theisistic view as absolute. Deifying one single finger pointing at the moon and ignoring all others. Deifying one's own particular section of the elephant, as it were. But going that further step and saying there is no moon, there is no elephant, simply based upon the evidence of all these contradictory stories is ludicrous. The work of a logician or a cretin who absolutizes themselves. John On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Fam. Kintziger-Karaca < [email protected]> wrote: > Greetz gang (Ham) > > Been thinking about the question you projected towards the moq about the > Theism-Atheism content. > as you pointed out from CA the moq is anti-theistic.(Pirsig) > I think i can see the difference between theistic-atheistic, and > anti-theistic. > Clearly anti-theistic derived from agnosticism. > Then we will see this, in the moq, things outside reality, are not > happening, they do not exist, hence they are fiction. > They will only become non-fiction when observed. > I think you are aware of this, Ham, I do not take you for a fool. > > Sincerely , Adrie. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
