On 5/20/10 4:39 PM, "Matt Kundert" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> > And if someone insists > on asking whether Quality is in the subject > or object? Just say, ³boththe object¹s made out of > inorganic, > and maybe biological static patterns of Quality, and for the subject > > just tack on some intellectual and/or social static patterns of Quality.² > And then you have your answer to a bad > question. The questions > won¹t stop, but > do they ever? > _________________________________________________________________ Hi Matt and all, Imho DQ is the answer to questions good and bad. Your appeal to evolution in the answer for ³both..² is intriguing. I don¹t know how you view evolution. For myself for evolution I use the musical octave as a template with small intervals in two places mi-fa and ti-do. Evolution is levels in existence. I like the musical octave as a template for evolution in existence. I consider ti_do to be impassable, so there is not an infinite explanation just a template. Emotions as undefined crosses mi-fa and it seems MOQ DQ/SQ is a useful explanation for continuing beyond matter-organic into consciousness. There is a limit to human consciousness and evolution is not unbounded. DQ answers questions. DQ/SQ a fine metaphysics. Joe Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
