Andre, Krimel, Absolutely All Fri June
Bodvar to Krimel: > > This leads to the false impression that there remains an > > unscathed Quality atop the DQ/SQ dichotomy, and made the latter-day > > Pirsig (in the Summary of 2005) say that the MOQ is the "static" part of > > a still greater Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics. This is horribly wrong IT > > IS QUALITY WHICH IS DIVIDED! Andre: > The 'false impression' is entirely yours Bodvar. Quality remains > 'unscathed' because it cannot be scathed. Static patterns of value are > abstracted from the (Quality) stimulus... . DQ, as used in LILA in > this instance,(it is used as denoting Quality and other times as the > referent to...) is used as a static intellectual reference to Quality! > All concepts need to be kept out of Quality. You cannot accept this, I > know but because of your non acceptance you reach the 'Quality/MOQ > meta-metaphysics result which is complete cowdung. Quality CANNOT BE > DIVIDED! I saw the unfortunate of my "dividing Quality" statement ... for Chrissake it's as Pirsigs says: There is QUALITY and static levels of QUALITY!! Yours above does not face the issue at all which is Pirsig's claim that the "Dynamic/Static" constellation is the STATIC part of a still greater "Quality/MOQ" metaphysics. This is untenable because it leads to an infinite metaphysical regress. Try to muster the unpolluted rest of your brain.. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
