Hi John, Nice to hear from you.
the > conceptualization of DQ as necessary for proper conceptualization of > SQ... I > was thinking along those lines myself just earlier and it's a delight > to > find a congruent formulation in your own words, concording with my > thoughts... See? That's Quality! > > [Mary Replies] Synchronicity. Way Cool. Happy am I! We've circled around long enough to understand each other, and find that we agreed all along. A high Quality conversation. > An important point to keep in mind, tho, is that in the truly socratic > dialogue, there are no losers. We all gain from the value of other > opinions > and views, and the synthesized out of many is the best formulation of > all. > [Mary Replies] Yeah, zero-sum games are so ... Biological Level. But I take your point and it didn't even hurt much. > I can hear Platt cringing over the collective's opinion, but see, > that's > what makes him such a valuable individual! > [Mary Replies] Maybe, but I imagine he would agree that it takes a collective effort to maintain the freedom of the individual. Best, Mary > Take Care, > > John the late Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
