Hello everyone On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Dan to everyone: > > Problems are opportunities for improvement. I'd have to go back and > review the archives but right off hand I don't recall any problems > with Quality vs Dynamic Quality. As I said in a previous post, I do > recall some discussions with Paul Turner on this subject that weren't > resolved to my satisfaction but I'd had to go back and refresh my > memory before commenting more. > > Andre: > Hi Dan, Anthony (in his PhD) suggests the 2 perspective approach to Pirsig's > use of Quality and Dynamic quality in LILA, which he uses interchangeably. > Paul picked up on this and gave some (for me clarifying) insights in their > different uses, by quoting examples. > Dq is referred to when applying to the static intellectual reference (in > your words 'to denote the undefined'). Quality is used when 'describing' > from a dynamic perspective. > > At least this is my understanding.
Hi Andre Thank you for the reference. I remember Paul had a blog going for a while where he explored ideas pertaining to this. Very interesting, I agree. Thanks again, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
