We got there in the end Matt. Like you, I can switch off from Bo (or Platt) - so can anyone. This is Horse's thread, not Bo's. A decision as moderator to not simply ignore him, but exactly as per your own advice,
to tell Bo to "shut the fuck up". Ian On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Matt Kundert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Heh, I had a feeling it _was_ a metaphor, but ya' know, > just in case there was some hardware issue. What the hell > do I know? > > And I guess I'll reiterate since it isn't: delete the fucking > emails. > > If you are too retarded to take the proper measures to > control your own psychic resources (and it took me a > while to learn how to do it), then maybe you aren't cut > out for talking to people. Because I still do not think it is > a good administrative move to take any action. > > That's the thing I need clarification on and for which, Ian, > you didn't help very well at all. So, thanks for making me > repeat myself again. > > What are we talking about? What options for _action_ are > we talking about? Administrative actions? Horse puts > down--as an administrator, and not as a regular poster--a > warning. What if Bo violates it? What are we talking about? > If it just involves asking Bo, "Please, shut the fuck up," then > this is nothing new, and I woke up from my vaca for nothing. > This is the same thing we've been doing for ages. But if it > involves Horse laying a warning, and then threatening some > action, what action? And I've already suggested that booting > is the wrong administrative action to be taken for the problem > as it seems to be understood. > > Nobody has helped clarify that for me. Apparently I just keep > stirring shit up, but I'm a pretty bright guy, and I take the > issue seriously, I'm not just trying to float my boat and do > moral grandstanding. I'm genuinely concerned about the > composition of the MD, and your just pissing down my leg, Ian. > > Matt > >> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 08:28:56 +0100 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [MD] Decision >> >> Aaaagghhh Matt, There's Horse trying to introduce cooling off and Matt >> give's us one of his yard long screeds ;-) >> >> Anyway the point No, No, No, I'll be brief. You said >> "I'm still not sure why we need to "draw a line" against >> anybody for "clogging up the entire MD bandwidth," but >> maybe there are practical/material/physical/electrical issues" >> >> No you dummy - our bandwidth - the mental traffic, the goodwill, the >> conversation, the tolerance, the intellect, the % of mails on this >> subject in our inboxes. >> >> I repeat ... the message is "give it a rest" Bo. >> Kill this intellectual pattern as instructed. >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Matt Kundert >> <[email protected]> wrote: (A Yard of Screed) >> > >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > _________________________________________________________________ > The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with > Hotmail. > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5 > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
