Adrie, The lack of evidence was not really a criticism, just an observation. A paper like this for lay understanding must almost always be rhetoric. (But I have researched these two guys web sites the last day or two - and asked a couple of physics friends - interesting.) Ian
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Fam. Kintziger-Karaca <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, Ian > > Wel regarding this artikel, one of your questions kept coming back at me. > > the question about leaving the evidence out , in the artikel. > The reason for this lays in the difference between theoretical physiks and > Hypothetikal physiks. > the difference of course is huge, theoretical physiks is exact science, > hypothetikal is not. > but hypothetical always preceides theoretikal, so the value is enourmous. > > Been thinking about your objections towards colliders etc..., strange. > If you like to interact on this matter , feel free to do so. > > Greetzz, Adrie > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
