Well put, Bo! > DMB > > 15 July : > > Mati said: > > ...What Bo points out is that SOM creates a distortion of > understanding > > reality, something Pirsig seems to really tease out in ZMM. One of > the > > distortions is that these thought patterns related to how we view > > ourselves via SOM. It is a nasty game of chasing your tail, but from > my > > very humble perspective SOL or now SIM, stop us from doing that. > > dmb says: > > Ron asked you to explain how SOM or SIM stops us from doing this? I'd > > also like to know what "this" is. It seems Bo's equation is supposed > > to save us from something. > [Bo] > It is of course the MOQ that "stops us" from using SOM as our frame > of reference, but the weak interpretation renders MOQ impotent by its > disastrous 4th.level which is SOM's "mind" in a Q-disguise. This the > strong interpretation puts right by making intellect what it was meant > to > be (in ZAMM) namely SOM stripped down to the S/O distinction. > Thereby the MOQ regains its strength and mows down all SOM- > induced paradoxes. > [DMB] > > What is that something, exactly? What's the problem? > [Bo] > The problem is the "weak interpreters" who postulate that the MOQ is > an expansion of the intellectual level which is impossible because Q- > intellect is MOQ's property, nothing that the MOQ can fit inside or > "expand". What you mean is an expansion of MIND and if mind is > back SOM is back and the MOQ is shot.. >
Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
