> Bo replied: > "Intellectual patterns for interpreting reality" is SOM to the hilt. An > objective reality "out there" with countless subjective interpretations "in > here". We see how the QUALITY/MOQ meta-metaphysics fits this. Quality now the > objective realm with the MOQ one of the many subjective interpretations. Good > Grief. > > > dmb says: > > This is probably THEE central misconception from which all of your nonsense > flows. You are interpreting this as if Quality were an objective reality, > which is exactly what it is NOT. So-called objective reality is what it is > regardless of what we think about it and there can only ever be one so-called > objective truth because there is only one objective reality, the physical > universe. The MOQ rejects that notion and replaces it with Dynamic Quality. > DQ is direct everyday experience, not matter or material reality. It is not > an objective reality that is what it is regardless of whether or not anyone > knows about it. As William James put it, "realities are what they are > experienced as". This assertion is positioned AGAINST the idea that reality > is "out there", separate from our experience of it. Instead, the idea that > reality is "out there" is relegated to secondary status. It's just an idea, > derived from the primary empirical reality, which is just the cutting edge of > experien ce itself and not a thing, not a substance, that is not yet sorted into categories like "physical" or "psychical". >
comment Adrie yes , i agree Dave, here one is able to see how Bo is braking the chain in the first place , he is taking off on "the" misconception to begin with. the problem is not to peel down the onion in the first place , but to create the onion as an onion. he peels the onion down to a carrot Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
