On Aug 5, 2010, at 8:01 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote: > [Marsha] > For me the MoQ is Reality = Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned > experience,) nothing more. > > [Arlo] > Are you saying a "Metaphysics of Quality" is the same as the "Quality" it > describes? Are you saying the "Metaphysics of Quality" precedes the > Dynamic/static distinction? > > I certainly buy Quality = Experience (and the static fall out of that is what > we affectionately call "reality"), but a "metaphysics" is a description of > Quality, it is not "Quality itself". Or, to use ZMM parlance, its "an > analogy". > > Isn't what you are saying akin to saying "The Bible IS God"? Or "Buddhism IS > the Buddha"? >
Greetings Arlo, For me MoQ represents Reality = Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience). Once I start to define or analyze the MoQ I've dropped squarely into the Intellectual Level. That's all she wrote. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
