On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:19 PM, John Carl wrote: > Marsha, > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> His right to expound fully on a topic was curtailed with the >> threat of being booted. >> >> > Threats only posses the power we give them with our fears. I'm not going to > obviate Bo that way. > > Furthermore, his right to expound fully on his favorite topic has not been > curtailed. He can pop up in my or yours or anyone's in-box at any time. In > practical terms, all that happened is that Horse has prevented more of Bo's > SOL from appearing in future archives. > > I see a parallel here with Phaedrus's explanation of what "accreditation" > meant to his student that wanted to post the National Guard to keep it from > being lost. The paper that led to the whole Church of Reason thesis. > > There is here, there, lots of places, an official recognition that people > seem to need to structure their participation. A way of orienting > themselves. But do they really? Stanford seems to do fine, without > accreditation.
Of course, John, not like your orientation towards some absolute something or other??? Huh? Marsha > > I wish Bodvar well. I like him and hope he returns some day with a fresh > perspective and presentation. If he so chooses, I'm sure Horse would not > object. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
