It's a conventional explanation, of course...    

On Aug 28, 2010, at 5:28 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> Greetings Adrian and Magnus,
> 
> I'd also like to mention something that I heard from Dennett or Dawkins about 
> having a prejudice towards change in a timeframe that is readily 
> experienced by humans.  Change may happen at speeds too fast for humans 
> to experience, or too slow for humans to experience.  What might seem 
> as not changing may just be a case of change too slow for us too experience. 
> 
> Just something to consider.    
> 
> Marsha 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 28, 2010, at 3:10 AM, Magnus Berg wrote:
> 
>> Hi Ade
>> 
>> First, never mind Frank. He's literally not for real and has a very peculiar 
>> sense of humor, just ignore him if he doesn't make sense, he seldom does.
>> 
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>> My name is Adrian, and i should like to ask a question.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Robert Pirsig says in Lila that static patterns are migrating toward 
>>> Dynamic Quality.
>>> I think i've got that right.
>>> He also says that static patterns latch and are stable.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> My question is how can patterns be stable and yet migrate toward Dynamic 
>>> Quality at the same time?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Some patterns seem to be too latched and stable and can not change. So they 
>>> are bad at being able to change.
>>> And yet others must be good at being able to change so they can migrate 
>>> toward Dynamic Quality as Robert Pirsig says in Lila.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> How is this possible?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Is this a new question or does Robert Pirsig give an answer somewhere?
>> 
>> It's not a completely new question, but I'm actually not sure it has been 
>> discussed here. I have thought about it though, very pragmatically I should 
>> add. Also, you might have noticed that many here on MD only see static 
>> patterns, and the levels, as some theoretical-only division of the world we 
>> see around us, so, for them, your question is actually not interesting, or 
>> even possible to ponder. They think, what happens, just happens, or using 
>> Krimel's words "Shit happens".
>> 
>> However, since you did ask the question, I'll assume you'd like a more 
>> direct answer, and mine goes something like:
>> 
>> One example is viruses. They are stable enough to be able to spread the same 
>> infection over more or less the whole world over a season. However, it's 
>> also dynamic enough to change into something else, if stopped by a new 
>> antibiotics.
>> 
>> But that didn't perhaps answer your question: *How* is it possible?
>> 
>> Then I have another example for you. It's been discussed here a few months 
>> ago if you want to search for the thread. It's about what happens when the 
>> inorganic level have reached the end of its possibilities.
>> 
>> As you know, the inorganic level is about physics and chemistry. I've even 
>> suggested to make chemistry into a level of its own, but that's not 
>> important here. Anyway, on the young earth, there was nothing what we now 
>> call life, just a big ocean in which chemistry did its deed. Chemistry is 
>> pretty static, because what it can do is very statically decided by the laws 
>> of chemistry. For example, if an O atom meets a pair of bonded H atoms (H2), 
>> then it immediately unbonds the H2 molecule and bind both H to the O atom, 
>> making water (H2O). The H atoms snaps into place on the top of the O forming 
>> a Mickey Mouse molecule. The laws of chemistry can do lots of other things, 
>> especially with the C atom with which it can build long chains containing 
>> both carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and other atoms. And every time a chemical 
>> experience/event happen, the result is dictated by the laws of chemistry and 
>> the atoms involved snaps into their predetermined place. Sometimes, when two 
>> of these larg
 e
>  molecules meet, they can combine chemically into an even larger molecule and 
> snaps into another shape, or the don't attract eachother chemically in which 
> case they simply bounce apart again.
>> 
>> However, sometimes when such large molecules meet, they happen to fit into 
>> eachother's shape like hand and glove and if they're really lucky, they even 
>> meet in the right direction so the hand fits in the glove. If that happens, 
>> two large molecules have bonded without the help of the laws of chemistry. 
>> The bond is much weaker than a chemical bond, but just because it *is* 
>> weaker, it's also more dynamic. It can let go of that bond if it "wants" to. 
>> I'd even say this is the precursor to what we today call "free will".
>> 
>> Some of these fitting molecules found another molecule that also fit, and 
>> some even became so large and complex it could build stuff using other 
>> molecules in its vicinity. One day, it was able to build a copy of itself, 
>> and the rest is, as we say, history. The history of life to be specific.
>> 
>> I claim that these shape fitting molecules are using biological value, i.e. 
>> it's the basis of the biological level and is the first step out of the 
>> static inorganic level into a completely new level. The process also gives a 
>> very good insight into what constitutes a new level, why they are discrete 
>> and how the level dependency really work, and not just a theoretical 
>> buzzword.
>> 
>> And to connect this with Pirsig, he has said that taste and smell are clear 
>> cut biological value/experiences. And this shape fitting process is exactly 
>> how smell works. So, for me, the case is pretty closed.
>> 
>>      Magnus
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to