On Sep 12, 2010, at 5:00 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> dmb to Marsha:
> 
> But they did. And so it's obviously NOT impossible. We are not hopelessly 
> trapped inside SOM or forever doomed to reify all our concepts. The patient 
> is not identical to his disease. If the patient is inherently diseased or if 
> the defect defines the intellect, then Pirsig's aim of expanding and 
> improving rationality would fail before it even got started. Your view not 
> only dismisses the MOQ's solution, you've ruled it out as impossible in 
> principle. To say this undermines Pirsig's work is actually quite an 
> understatement, unless one uses "undermine" in the original military sense, 
> as part of a siege.
> 
> Andre:
> Thank you for this dmb, it is nice to feel (also intellectually!) that I am 
> not alone in this. I must be honest and say that I get tears in my eyes 
> sometimes (in utter desperation), when also in conversation with Bodvar, it 
> was about the raping (I have no other word for it) of Mr. Pirsig's ideas in 
> his two books and subsequent appearances on dvd, tape and papers.
> 
> The seemingly total misapprehension of what the man is on about.
> 
> And then, having the audacity to use one's own preconceived ideas to 
> interpret ZMM and LILA and then, based on these self same ideas, to criticize 
> the man, is very disheartening to say the least.
> 
> Empty the cup before you start on anything new. There are some on this list 
> who mix their already filled cup with MOQ stuff. You cannot do this. It leads 
> to misapprehensions and blaming Mr. Pirsig for things he is NOT responsible 
> for. You have to take a fresh approach. This takes guts. This means throwing 
> away loads of static patterns.It means uncertainty, it means wobbling, it 
> means throwing yourself in the deep end of experience...it means complete 
> honesty with yourself. This is some bastard of a confrontation! As John 
> mentioned some time ago: metaphysics is not for sissies. Well, certainly the 
> MOQ is not.......... and at the same time it is. It is home.
> 
> Design you cup-MOQ and throw all the past SOM constructed entities therein 
> and see for yourself what is left after the sifting. As I mentioned before, 
> this is what I had hoped this discuss would be about. I am truly glad that 
> some people are listening and responding.


Marsha: 
What's left is unpatterned experience and patterned experience, a very valuable 
experienced understanding.      

 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to