On Sep 19, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha to Andre: > > My questions specifically were how are feelings, passions and other modes of > consciousness > included back into rationality as dmb suggested? How are they included back > into science? > How are they included back into mathematics? How? > > Andre: > Without wanting to be a smart-arse Marsha, I think that the MOQ is asking > (and answering) the > points you raise. It specifically asks how on earth it has been possible to > exclude them. ZMM > and LILA have adequately answered these, as dmb has pointed out to you by > giving you relevant > passages.
What you think is adequate means nothing to me, especially since dmb never quoted LILA. > > Our consciousness functions through them and through our consciousness they > function. The test > of the quality of this functioning lies in direct experience. This is, as far > as I understand it, > what the radical empiricist argues and offers. > > Marsha: > I guess maybe I should thank you, Adrie and Ron for standing in for the > philosophologist. > > Andre: > If you are this unsure about it, don't do it. And your further addition is > uncalled for. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
