John Stewart is one sharp guy, again.
Ian

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Ian Glendinning
<[email protected]> wrote:
> It turns up in the UK as the Oct 5th highlights package on C4OD.
> http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart/4od#3126165
> Ian
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Ian Glendinning
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks Marsha,
>>
>> Unforts I was in US earlier in the week (in Philly), but being back in
>> the UK now, I can't see the TV feed for the Daily Show. (Need to track
>> down the UK channel 4 highlights I guess.)
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:27 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Steve, Ian,
>>>
>>> Rumor has it that Sam Harris was on the Oct 4th Daily Show,
>>> which can be watched on the computer at:
>>>
>>> http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/mon-october-4-2010-sam-harris
>>>
>>> The interview is too disruptive to more than a hint of the books contents, 
>>> but
>>> it's interesting.
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Steven Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I suppose anyone interested in the national conversation about morals
>>>> such as all MOQers will want to read Harris's book which has just been
>>>> released.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.amazon.com/Moral-Landscape-Science-Determine-Values/dp/1439171211/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1286454755&sr=8-1
>>>>
>>>> I look forward to discussing it with you.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Harris:
>>>> "The people of Albania have a venerable tradition of vendetta called
>>>> “Kanun”: If a man commits a murder, his victim’s family can kill any
>>>> one of his male relatives in reprisal. If a boy has the misfortune of
>>>> being the son or brother of a murderer, he must spend his days and
>>>> nights in hiding, forgoing a proper education, adequate health care,
>>>> and the pleasures of a normal life. Untold numbers of Albanian men and
>>>> boys live as prisoners of their homes even now. Can we say that the
>>>> Albanians are morally wrong to have structured their society in this
>>>> way? Is their tradition of blood feud a form of evil? Are their values
>>>> inferior to our own?
>>>>
>>>> Most people imagine that science cannot pose, much less answer,
>>>> questions of this sort. How could we ever say, as a matter of
>>>> scientific fact, that one way of life is better, or more moral, than
>>>> another? Whose definition of “better” or “moral” would we use?
>>>> Scientists generally believe that answers to questions of human value
>>>> will fall perpetually beyond our reach—not because human subjectivity
>>>> is too difficult to study, or the brain too complex, but because there
>>>> is no intellectual justification for speaking about right and wrong,
>>>> or good and evil, in universal terms. While many scientists now study
>>>> the evolution of morality, as well as its underlying neurobiology, the
>>>> purpose of their research is merely to describe how human beings think
>>>> and behave. No one expects science to tell us how we should think and
>>>> behave. Controversies about human values are controversies about which
>>>> science officially has no opinion.
>>>>
>>>> This has made science appear divorced, in principle, from the most
>>>> important questions of human life. While most educated people will
>>>> concede that the scientific method has delivered centuries of fresh
>>>> embarrassment to religion on matters of fact, it is now an article of
>>>> almost unquestioned certainty, both inside and outside scientific
>>>> circles, that science has nothing to say about what constitutes a good
>>>> life. Religious thinkers in all faiths, and on both ends of the
>>>> political spectrum, are united on precisely this point: The defense
>>>> one most often hears for belief in God is not that there is compelling
>>>> evidence for His existence, but that faith in Him is the only reliable
>>>> source of meaning and moral guidance. Mutually incompatible religious
>>>> traditions now take refuge behind the same non sequitur.
>>>>
>>>> As I argue in my new book, The Moral Landscape, questions about
>>>> values—about meaning, morality, and life’s larger purpose—are really
>>>> questions about the well-being of conscious creatures. Throughout the
>>>> book I make reference to a hypothetical space that I call “the moral
>>>> landscape”—a space of real and potential outcomes whose peaks
>>>> correspond to the heights of potential well-being and whose valleys
>>>> represent the deepest possible suffering. Different ways of thinking
>>>> and behaving—different cultural practices, ethical codes, modes of
>>>> government, etc.—will translate into movements across this landscape
>>>> and, therefore, into different degrees of human flourishing. I’m not
>>>> suggesting that we will necessarily discover one right answer to every
>>>> moral question, or a single best way for human beings to live. Some
>>>> questions may admit of many answers, each more or less equivalent.
>>>> However, the existence of multiple peaks on the moral landscape does
>>>> not make them any less real or worthy of discovery. Nor would it make
>>>> the difference between being on a peak and being stuck deep in a
>>>> valley any less clear or consequential..."
>>>> ...
>>>> read on at 
>>>> http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-10-02/sam-harris-on-the-moral-landscape/?cid=hp:mainpromo7
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>>
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>>
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to