[Mark, previously] > In my opinion the highest quality of such morality is non-interference.
. If instead you consider the highest quality of morality being "Do no harm", then you're off to a better start. Because if someone is doing no harm, there is no obligation to interfere with them. As such the non-interference rule is derived from one more basic. . [Mark] > My point was that it is the phenomenon of leaders and followers > that create the notion of immorality (or morality)... > Leaders are to blame for wars and fomenting hate, > not the general populace. But there would not be leaders > without followers. IMHO you're dealing with the symptoms instead of curing the disease. Sure there are leaders like Stalin & Mao, but there are also leaders like Socrates & Gandhi. Substitute "role-model" for leader & you get a different perspective. The problem lies not in the relationship between leader & follower or role-model and emulator, but in the values each of these hold. Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
