> Hi Dan, > > Thank you for your response. I respect that and believe I have a different > approach. But, sorry, I can't wait in this mire. Got to go, my watch is > ticking. Back down the rabbit hole! Maybe I'll see you there; it depends > on how far you are willing to go. > > If you haven't seen "What the Bleep do we Know", I would suggest looking at > it as a tutorial to loosen up the brain a little. > See you later? > > >> Dan: >> I'm not sure I do understand when someone complains about reading >> books or the archives. I am like a kid in a candy store when it comes >> to that kind of stuff. But I suppose we each have our own experiences >> and your experience must tell you that you already know all that, so >> you don't need to read. So be it. To me, though, it is sad. And like I >> said, it is your loss, not mine. >> >> Dan >> > I am not being derogatory here, but I do not have patience for Bible thumpers. By all means, (re)interpret the books you have, I did that years ago. I strongly suspect that you hope to find meaning in this form of interlocution, and are not just ego protecting itself. I can certainly withdraw the hand of reconciliation if that helps you.
Cheers, Mark Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
