> Hi Adrie,
> I am glad you supported your argument with the link. I have not read it,
> but I can imagine what it says. Yes, you are reducing to absurdity. The
> three sentences you provide are a good example of that. Chanting is used
> heavily in certain religions, and does have value in that sense. If such
> chanting brings you peace of mind, who am I to deny that? Sounds like you
> may have Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Look it up, I'm sure Wikipedia talks
> about it. You are projecting. Arguing with the mirror, that is the echo
> you are hearing.
>
> But, thanks for being involved in the discussion. Hope you recuperate.
>
> Mark
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> The "Bodvar by proxy" approach
>>
>> The "Bodvar by proxy" approach
>>
>> The "Bodvar by proxy" approach,......
>>
>> oops , did i just repeat myself all the time?
>> Guess i did, strange, an echoe from Norway
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
>>
>> Platt exploiting recuparguments.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
