Your usual pedantry Craig ;-) ? Or a total cop out if you prefer. We don't have complete knowledge about anything for that matter, if that's your take. I was being more pragmatic .... I am interested in how the concept of god affects the real world we experience, so in that sense I am not agnostic. Far from it.
Existence and complete knowledge belong on the head of that pin. Ian On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:33 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > [Ian] >> Agnosticism can only ever be an incomplete or temporary state. > > Agnosticism is the view that we do not have complete knowledge about god: > in particular, whether god exists or not. So, it is by definition an > incomplete state. > But there is no reason to think we will ever know the answer to whether god > exists or not, > so it need not be a temporary state. > Craig > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
