On Nov 15, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote: > [Mark] > Before I can address this, could you please explain what in particular you > are presenting by the phrase "what Pirsig has offered"? > > [Arlo] > How is this confusing, it simply means what Pirsig himself wrote about (in > this case) the intellectual level. > > In this case, Pirsig wrote, ".. .the greatest meaning can be given to the > intellectual elvel if it is confined to the skilled manipulation of abstract > symbols that have no corresponding particular experience and which behave > according to rules of their own". > > [Mark] > At the same time what is your interpretation of Pirsig's Intellectual level? > > [Arlo] > I am in agreement with Pirsig. > > [Marsha] > Marsha presented hers. > > [Arlo] > Yes, she did. And she has every right to argue why her idea that > Intellect=SOM is better than Pirsig's. What explanatory power do you think > this view offers, since you seem to support it, that is better than the > Intellect!=SOM idea offered by Pirsig?
Marsha: I'm waiting to discuss my ideas about the reification process with RMP when he invites to lunch, meanwhile I'll present my ideas as I judge appropriate. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
