Matt Having clearly quoted Rorty as saying "mystical experience" leads (via its rhetoric) to moral and intellectual progress.. You said
"I (Matt) like the rhetoric of mysticism-as-poetry" whereas "Dave likes the rhetoric of mysticism-as-radical-empiricism" You said your problem is relating these two ... reconciling Dave's view with yours. I was simply pointing out that Rorty has already joined mysticism to experience for you. What (either or both of) you should focus on was relating poetry to experience, in order to find the common rhetorical ground. Ian On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Matt Kundert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > I'm confused by what you meant here (whose problem, what the problem is): > >> I think your problem (Dave's problem with Rorty) is not so much >> difficulty with mysticism-as-(radical)-experience, but >> "radical-experience-as-poetry" > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
