Hi Marsha,

Yeah, interesting.  Arsenic is similar to phosphorous, but obviously not as
well suited to the evolution of life.  It is always nice to see the
platypuses of science.  People become amazed because they are so entrench in
a certain way of thinking, that they see it as some kind of revolution.
 Such is the behavior to seemingly static concepts.  There are many more
types of bacteria than we have currently identified, many more.

Once it is shown that DNA came from outer-space (just a matter of time),
then we'll have to rethink some of our creationist stories.

Mark

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:17 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> FYI
>
>
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/02/nasa-new-life-arsenic-bacteria_n_791094.html?view=print
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to