Hi Mark
What is the Value of MD, is it to wide, to crazy or does it make sense?
What was before cause and effect? The condition that made cause and
effect possible to be. It is very hard to imagine what was before cause
and effect was possible. But we can understand what conditions that must
be present for any event to occur. We have raw energy (which can be the
result of the possibility of energy into materia and antimateria), the
mathematic connections that separates the possible combinations from the
impossible and third, we have the time space for the energy to expand
into building particles, molecules and unconsciuos repeated patterns up
to the 4 levels of dynamic quality.
The I is in the centre of the 3-D pattern of quality for any event. It
is the answer on the question "Hi there stranger, how do you choose?"
(How do you sort your valuations? Hey babe, what sign r u?)
From the first choice of taking the first breath. (Not the 1st but at
an early state for the personality. Some choose unconsciosly not to
start breathing at birth.)
This is the reason why most individuals see their I as an unbroken
line based at their inner personal centre.
Every choice is between several possibilities, all with the potential to
either increase or decrease the total value of your personal event on
earth. The event that is as long as you live in this world.
Is something missing?
Do I have to change something in me?
How can I use what I already got right?
Breath on, tune in, drop out... T Leary
Unconscious I's, like bacterias and bible fundamentalists, their choices
are based on their automated pattern evolved by darwinistic selection,
different and new choice is done by mutations and succesful mutations
are repeated as approven choices. "We're doing as usual and that's our
distinctive feature. Mutations are evil and against the creation."
Societies are made up of material and economic volume as the mass, the
weight of the state. The manner of the civilisation are managed by
dogmatic instincts and legal system. Ther must also be a freedom to
evolve into anything new. Ideas and thinking can't be regulated or sold
as property. This is the basic theme of "Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité".
(Liberty, Equality, Brotherhood) the motto of the state of France and
Haiti. Freedom of thinking and speech. Juridical Equality. Brotherhood
in the economic welfare. Any enterprise is dependant of its surrounding
partners.
Governments has to choose if they shall support the economic growth by
mortgaging tax incomes of the year 2025 and spread the money on todays
open market, tighten or loosing laws and taxes or spend more money on
risky projects as NASA or the Rethoric department at the University of
Bozeman. All in its effort to confirm the political I-dentity of the
party in power which are supposed to be a unbroken continuation of the
nations identity since it was born. Increasing the Value of the nation
as an event with quality. Who knows, some day we will see a political
party whos program is a total make over and change of the USA into a new
France, or Haiti.
Mass, shape and effect, different sides of the coin.
Got the picture?
JA
[email protected] skrev 2010-12-03 08.01:
Hi Tim,
When I am busy, I look for the posts that say Hi Mark, or something
like that. On gmail I can only see about the first 6 words.
Sometimes when I have more time I go back and look at others, but I
have lots of unread email in the box. I will keep a look out for
rapsncows and at least open those.
>>
>> [Mark]
>> Sometimes I am not that clear. ?However, the sense of self or "I" is
>> about
>> the only thing that I am sure about. ?Even my thinking happens to me as
>> something foreign. ?But the "I" is what it is all about.
>
> [Tim]
> I can sympathize with a foreign feeling to my thinking, at least
> frequently: I don't know how 'new' thoughts can arise just because I
> 'try'.
[Mark]
Yes, it means there is a "tryer" in there somewhere. Maybe there is a
head neuron or something. Like a five star general directing
everything, that is the "I". Doesn't make sense to me though.
>
> I'm glad to hear that you are sure about your sense of your 'I': I was
> under the understanding that you thought otherwise (however that would
> work). ?Importantly, when you say 'the "I" is what it is all about.', I
> hope you mean all I's.
[Mark]
No not otherwise. However, having said that, it is still possible to
have an "I" that really does not exist. Of course this is a
meaningless statement, but what I mean is that it does not arise
inherently. This is a Buddhist notion that we are the sum of many
things and not a true existence in itself. I think the purpose of
this is too not take things so seriously, but to be free. Such
freedom is said to result in selfless compassion for all sentient
beings. At least that is what the converts say. So maybe it is good.
It makes sense to me. It is the ego which causes pain. I would also
have to say that this concept is difficult for me to stay within for
very long. Something always comes up that distracts me.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
