Hi Matt and DMB, As I understand this debate,
1. DMB accused Matt of missing something important by not using the vocabulary of radical empiricism. 2. Matt wondered what is gained from that vocabulary in arguing against Platonism that can't be done using the vocabulary of psychological nominalism. 3. DMB said that they are not the same thing. 4. Matt said he never said that they were. (DMB should see 2. again because he missed the point.) 5. DMB finally got to the question and said that psychological nominalism denies "immediate experience" and "pre-intellectual" awareness. But this doesn't really answer the question. Those are terms Matt wouldn't want to use, but what do you get out of those terms that Matt can't get out of his terms? Best, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
