"First, it provides little insight into psychological phenomena...
Second, brains-in-love talk conflates levels of explanation.
The third thing wrong with neurobabble is that it has pernicious feedback
effects on science itself. Too much immature science has received massive
funding, on the assumption that it illuminates psychology. The idea that the
neural can replace the psychological is the same idea that led to thinking that
all psychological ills can be cured with drugs."
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/a-real-science-of-mind/
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
