Marsha
Without bad quality there will be no need for good quality. Bad taste is
the ultimate well of proper sense. Need is the Mother of Invention. As I
now have found a working definition for good quality I will aim my
torchlight into the deep sources of need for a better behaviour and will
start my investigations in my own poor appearance in this dark world of
unenlightment and ugly radio channels. Please Support Zappa Radio!
http://www.zappa.com/zapparadio/ :-)
An absolute good quality is a perishable event related to some other
event of Dynamic Quality. I think it's very well defined in Lila ch.
11-12.. The Value of an absolute good quality is 1, a perfect division
between the dynamic quality and the static (ultimate) quality, in three
dimensions of the event, it's real amount, it's pattern and it's useful
expression.
The example http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVtw-en2H5U (now available on
Youtube) is a short little movie with an OK content but it has got the
wrong angle and I don't know how to rotate a film clip so the pattern of
it is a little bit "disqualified" which makes the total quality less than 1.
Got it?
Jan-Anders
[email protected] skrev 2010-12-26 21.04:
Are you talking of an absolute "good quality" or something other? Sorry, I am
not a member of facebook so don't have access to the video. Maybe you can explain what
you mean.
Marsha
On Dec 26, 2010, at 4:21 AM, Jan-Anders wrote:
> Hi Adrie and Marsha
>
> This is an example of how something can have good quality in content but still the presentation is messed up by the form of it.
>
> http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=493477069259
>
> An iPad would probably give it a higher quality as the total quality is composed by both the content and how it is presented.
>
> JA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
