Matt, wow, we're back to very long mails again ... Not ignoring it, but I may be some time ... just a quickie ...
Yes I did see that you had imparted that view (it was part of my original summary), yet some Dave / Steve / ?still seemed (to me) to be arguing semantics of definitions. (See one-liner response to the other one.) Semantics of difference BTW (your James quote) is pretty much at the root of any MoQish / Metaphysics view I hold. (Difference that makes a difference that is, not difference that happens to exist in word games) Ian On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Matt Kundert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Ian, > > Ian said: > My summary is (again, but in alternative wording) - you/we are in > fact "agreeing" on what the definitions and distinctions ARE (between > the different forms of "truth"), but some of us are failing to see the > SIGNIFICANCE which others (particularly Dave) see, in our MoQ > context. The "Yes, but so what ?" conclusion. (Given the pragmatic > rider .... for all practical purposes .... a rider of Dave's you actually > clipped-off a quote that I agreed with.) > > Matt: > Sure, absolutely. I hopefully articulated that ... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
