Hi Andre, Sorry to confuse you with that below. What I mean is that good and evil are intuitive apprehensions which are then expressed with rational thought. First comes the awareness that something is good or evil for us, then we turn (in our heads) to supporting that rationally. Things cannot be rationally good or evil, they always boil down to an "emotional" understanding. We cannot rationally explain why killing is bad, for example.
Hope this makes more sense. Mark On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark to us Guys: > > Good and evil can be considered as emotional adjectives (just ask a sadist). > By emotional, I mean that they are imbued with Quality,which encompasses > rational thought as a subset. > > Andre: > Hi Mark, not sure if I follow all this. Let me untangle it as I seek > clarification: > > Are you saying that good and evil are 'descriptions' of emotional (Quality) > states which 'bring forth' rational thought? > > Confused. > Andre > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
