Hi Ian, > Pirsig spends a long time on Art / Rta / Crafts etc ... so you can't > reduce it to a single either or. There is no "it". That would be > reductionist.
What is wrong with reductionism? > Is art DQ or isn't it ? (As I said already, art is full of both kinds > of patterns - but the essential experience that distinguish the > artistic from non-artistic is clearly DQ.) Is Dynamic Quality a pattern? > "dynamic" is clearly not the same as "Dynamic Quality" - one is > natural language one is an undefined split in some undefinable > metaphysical monad - sq is the defined part. I'm not the one trying to > define the undefinable. > > I live the undefinable. > Ian Okay. But can you please define your answers to the above two questions of mine? :-) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
