On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Dan Glover <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dan: > I'm sorry, Ron, but this simply doesn't make sense. When we follow > static quality patterns we are without choice. John: "When we follow" Dan, includes a prerequisite choice - it's implied in the construction of "following" anything. Sorry, but the one who simply doesn't make sense is the one saying, "we can choose to follow the path of non-choice" True, but that doesn't mean choice doesn't exist. It obviously does. Dan: > That is the ultimate > accountability factor, in my opinion. We either do it or we don't > survive. So what I see you saying is: I have choices so I do not have > to take on the responsibility of doing what is better. I can do what I > want. I can drink only single malt whiskey. That is my choice. > > Now tell me... how can a person argue with that? > > Depends upon how a person chooses to argue with that. Or whether. Choice means the freedom to do what is not good. Without that freedom, the very concept of "good" would be meaningless Dan. I don't see how you cannot see this simple point. Take care, John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
