Dan:

Your intrepretations run contrary to what the MOQ is saying. And as
long as they do, they are not high quality interpretations of the MOQ.
You are entitled to your opinions. That I don't deny. But those
opinions are wrong when it comes to understanding the MOQ.

Ron:
But Dan you are not offering any reasons why besides the contention
that your interpretation of Pirsigs work is the true one.

That is the arguement.

Make a case as to why.

Now THAT would be doing some Philosophy and not just some philosophilogy.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to