Hi Marsha, Thanks for the interaction, I certainly learned a lot. And, thanks for that last math equation, Ham will be proud.
Cheerio, Mark On Thursday, April 28, 2011, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Mark, > > On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:43 AM, 118 wrote: > >> >>> Marsha: >>> I'm sticking with DQ as "indivisible, undefinable and unknowable". - I do >>> think one should be able to explain how to recognize an intellectual >>> static pattern of value. To assign 'science' as an intellectual pattern >>> explains nothing. 'Science' and 'zero,' are names, not patterns. >>> >> [Mark] >> OK >>> >>> >>> Marsha" >>> "providing guidance' sounds like 'intention.' What I mean by function is >>> more about how it behaves: abstracts, isolates, reifies to know and >>> manipulate. >> >> [Mark] >> Yeah, that is why I have difficulty ascribing function to DQ. We can >> certainly see how the intellectual level behaves in hind-sight. I >> don't think that level abstracts, it is abstraction. >> >> How about if we analogize the intellectual level to a movie on the >> screen. This process has several parts. The movie (in days of old) >> is on a film which has light passed through it, the light carries the >> information and hits a screen where what was once light is now broken >> up into all sorts of static patterns. Which part do you think could >> be the intellectual level? > > > Marsha: > Most generally, the intellectual level would be the part that is > opposite-from-non-(intellectual level). And your analogy and my response > signals the end of further discussion. > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
