Hi all,

In the Moral Landscape, Sam  Harris addresses the issue of free will
over about ten very interesting pages.

You can listen to him read those pages here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dodTNPp12rg&safety_mode=true&persist_safety_mode=1

Ron and DMB expressed concerns for the implications of dispelling the
illusion of free will on the notion of moral responsibility. I
encourage you to listen to the book section, but here is a relevant
taste:

"Clearly, we need to build prisons for people who are intent on
harming others. But if we could incarcerate earthquakes and hurricanes
for their crimes, we would build prisons for them as well. The men and
women on death row have some combination of bad genes, bad parents,
bad ideas and bad luck – which of these quantities, exactly, were they
responsible for? No human being stands as author to his own genes or
own upbringing, and yet we have every reason to believe that these
factors determine his character throughout his life. Our system of
justice should reflect our understanding that each of us could have
been dealt a very different hand in life…The urge for
retribution…seems to depend upon our not seeing the underlying causes
of human behavior." (109)

"Despite our attachment to the notion of free will, most of us know
that disorders of the brain can trump the best intentions of the mind.
This shift in understanding represents progress toward a deeper, more
consistent, and more compassionate view of our common humanity – and
we should note that this is progress away from religious metaphysics.
It seems to me that few concepts have offered greater scope for human
cruelty than the idea of an immortal soul that stands independent of
all material influences, ranging from genes to economic systems."
(110)

The issue of mental illness is relevant to Pirsig of course. We see
mentally ill people as compelled to act in certain ways because of
malfunctions, but are we then to think that they have less of this
special ingredient called free will than sane people? In an MOQ
analysis of freedom it actually makes some sense to say so, but on a
traditional view of free will this is absurd.

Best,
Steve
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to