Hi Ham, On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Ham Priday <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ron -- > [Ron] >> What you call nothingness as a limit, fails to explain >> movement, it does not account for the "why" of >> experience, it does not account for the good. > [Ham] > The appearance of movement in space, like change over time, is the mode of > human experience. Spacio-temporal perception of differentiated "otherness" > is a dimensional aspect of experiential value and reflects the primary > self/other dichotomy I mentioned previously. All human experience is > derived from the differentiation and objectification of Value, our > sensibility of which is limited by the nothingness of our individuated > awareness.
[Mark] Ham, would you say the our "attraction" to the absolute source can be considered to be spacio-temporal perception? That is, it involves movement? Thanks, Mark > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
