Ron:
The sophists as rationalists? That's hard to believe. Plato is considered to be 
the father of rationalism. You seem to be claiming the opposite of what Pirsig 
said and I never ran into anyone who disagreed with him. I'm skeptical ... but 
I am also quite curious. Could you dish up some specifics, some excepts or 
something?




> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:26:48 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [MD] The trouble with Sophists
> 
> In "Sophist" by Plato the visitor from Elea seems to make similar assertions
> about the Sophist as RMP makes against modern academia. The visitor asserts
> to Theatus that the sophist reify concepts and sell them as the experiences 
> they
> represent he also criticizes their use of rhetoric as rationalized arguements 
> not
> grounded in empirical experience.
>   This is pretty much the same arguement raised in "Phaedrus" in which 
> Socrates
> tries to persuade Phaedrus that an empirically grounded oratory is superior 
> and 
> best precedes any rhetoricaly persuasive arguement. In effect the Sophist is 
> being 
> 
> branded a rationalist.
> 
> It is also interesting to note how Socrates use of Elanchus is illustrated as 
> the effort
> to understand a concept or situation plurally and relationally in a radically 
> empirical
> manner.
> 
> a good read.
> 
> ..
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to