Hi Matt, I am not ready to abandon a metaphysical description DQ/SQ to a systematic supplementation of a laundry list of uses. The imagination is fertile while IMHO a laundry list of undefined/defined seems exclusive DQ/SQ.
Joe On 9/4/11 3:13 PM, "Matt Kundert" <[email protected]> wrote: > What this local creation of "one use of DQ" from Pirsig cries out for > is a systematic supplementation of a laundry list of uses, thereby > moving us forward in "what Pirsig means." I have not the will power > or time to do this myself, but it would the larger stage to perform on > in order to isolate what a thinker's central term really meant to the > thinker. It would be a boon for every Pirsigian, not just one > interpretation or another's. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
