On Sep 9, 2011, at 1:15 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha to Andre: > And? > > Andre: > Your motivation to be on this list is a fraud Marsha. Very low quality > indeed. Very sad. >
Here's some questions to you that that you have left unanswered since last July. On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:46 PM, MarshaV wrote: Andre, Let's say Sam Harris has read your 'An Open Letter by Andre Broersen to Sam Harris', he might ask: You have categorized 'science' as an intellectual static pattern of value, but not explained what that means. 'Science' is a name, a designator, a label; what makes 'science' an intellectual pattern? How do I differentiate an intellectual pattern from a social pattern? How do I differentiate 'science' as an intellectual pattern from a social pattern? Do you tell him that 'science' is an intellectual pattern because you, Andre, say so? Or do tell him 'science' is an intellectual pattern because Mr. Pirsig says so? Or do you tell him 'science' is an intellectual pattern because the cultural glasses say so? Or what? Marsha . ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
