Steve said to dmb:
I can see how you would think you need to do that [give up on Steve] given the 
embarrassing position you find yourself in. You've berated me for "improper use 
of terms" while you've been found to have been defending compatiblism as the 
exact opposite of what your beloved SEP defines it to be. You berated me for 
months for asserting two mutually exclusive fundamentally conflicting ideas...


dmb says:
Thanks. That's a really great example. As usual, you're pressing a point that 
has already been answered. Like I said, all you have to do is find the answer 
and add the phrase "like I said" to front of it. 

Like I said (at least twice):
...For anyone to maintain a compatibilist position, one has to use a softer 
definition of "determinism", a version soft enough to allow for the freedom it 
is supposedly compatible with. And, obviously, one has to use a softer version 
precisely because it's logically impossible to say that freedom is compatible 
with a total lack of freedom. That's the kind of nonsense I've been complaining 
about throughout this debate. 

What's worse is that Steve is willing to make this charge even though I made 
this point already. Just yesterday, in fact, I said to Steve, "You're 
describing compatibilism as a position that maintains two mutually exclusive 
ideas at the same time. That is nonsense. By analogy, a thing can be warm but 
it cannot be rightly described as hot and cold at the same time because one 
rules out the other. It [compatibilism] says there are determining factors but 
not to the exclusion of all freedom. It simply doesn't make any sense to say we 
are 100% determined and also say that we are free. To be a compatibilist, you 
cannot embrace determinism too. To be a compatibilist, you cannot deny freedom 
but that's exactly what the determinist does."


Steve also said to dmb: 
I'd hate to see you bail out now that we are making so much progress.


dmb says:
I would describe the amount of progress gained over the last six months as 
exactly "zero". And you have just proven once again that you're just not 
capable of listening. How many times have I repeated the point above, which 
you're asking about as if it I haven't already said several times. Each time 
you do that, it's just further proof that you are oblivious and delusional. And 
you do that every single time. 

Yawn!










                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to