Mark, DQ is unknowable, undivideable & undefinable - unpatterned. I wonder how you think entanglement relates to DQ? The announcement is interesting. Such excitement! I hope there are more programs addressing it. Maybe it will be a topic on npr's Science Friday.
Marsha On Sep 30, 2011, at 10:52 AM, 118 wrote: > Hi Marsha, > I heard parts of it while I was working. An interesting little bit on sq. > Use it for what it is worth to you. The idea of entanglement already shows > "influences" outside of time. This "spooky action from a distance" suggests > that an action on a particle here is matched by a change, in particle light > years away, instantaneously. This concept has more relevance to MoQ and the > "nature" of DQ, IMO. > > Cheers, > > Mark > > On Sep 29, 2011, at 8:04 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> --- On Point with Tom Ashbrook --- >> >> E=mc2 is the one piece of physics everybody knows. Einstein’s special >> relativity theory. 1905. Says nothing can travel faster than the speed of >> light. It’s the basis, the bedrock, of modern physics. And last week, out >> of the big CERN facility in Europe, the stunning news that some speedy >> little neutrinos have been clocked traveling faster. Faster than the speed >> of light. >> >> To physicists, that’s more than an earthquake. Most are skeptical so far. >> Waiting for confirmation. But if it were true? Time travel fans, start >> your engines. >> >> This hour On Point: speedy neutrinos rock Einstein’s world. >> >> >> http://onpoint.wbur.org/2011/09/29/tracking-neutrinos (Audio available >> shortly after broadcast) >> >> >> >> On Sep 29, 2011, at 10:57 AM, MarshaV wrote: >> >>> >>> NYT: >>> >>> >>> The physics world is abuzz with news that a group of European physicists >>> plans to announce Friday that it has clocked a burst of subatomic particles >>> known as neutrinos breaking the cosmic speed limit — the speed of light — >>> that was set by Albert Einstein in 1905. >>> >>> If true, it is a result that would change the world. But that “if” is >>> enormous. >>> >>> Even before the European physicists had presented their results — in a >>> paper that appeared on the physics Web site arXiv.org on Thursday night and >>> in a seminar atCERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research, on Friday — >>> a chorus of physicists had risen up on blogs and elsewhere arguing that it >>> was way too soon to give up on Einstein and that there was probably some >>> experimental error. Incredible claims require incredible evidence. >>> >>> >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/science/23speed.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=neutrinos&st=cse >>> >>> ___ >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
