On Oct 15, 2011, at 4:04 AM, MarshaV wrote: > Marsha: > I do find comparing and contrasting different philosophers interesting, > and being able to present a point or refute a point very valuable. Such > presentations may possibly help clarify an important issue. But that James > and Dewey and Pirsig use similar key concepts does not place them in the > same pigeonhole, or validate each other, or make them interchangeable. > There is a philosophy at hand. It is the Metaphysics of Quality. There may > be similar aspects between the MoQ and a great many other philosophies, > but it is also unique. > > I will dismiss your evaluations of RMP as a limited scholar, as well as your > evaluation of what is a 'bad argument' because as presented they seem > just your opinion. It brings to mind the differences between an artist and > an art critic. > > > > ___
Sorry, Matt, I forgot to properly close, and thank you for writing. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
