You've got a good nose for these things David. "Bo right, for the wrong reasons" is what I smell too.
And for so long, he patiently pointed out that there was problem, even while doing it all wrong. And yet such loyalty to his cause, has had a positive effect, I believe. If the others can just grasp it. Said the shephard boy to the mighty king, do you smell what I smell? Way up in your palace (academic) halls, mighty king (of intellect) Always good to hear from an honest voice, howling in the wilderness, Dave. John On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:30 PM, David Thomas < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > In general I think you might have picked up the scent. > > Could it be that intellect as a primary emergent level is a myth on a > metaphysical level? > > This morning I was watching a couple of videos of the series that Marsha > posted ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sg-SGofRFo&feature=related) > and under 21 Emergence and Whitehead the narrator says that these > philosophers most basic levels were: physical, chemical, biological, and > psychological. No social. No intellectual. Or that social and intellectual > were secondary qualities (parts of) of psychological, not primary emergent > levels with radically different properties. > > So Bo may have been right but for the wrong reasons. > > Dave > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
