Hi John, Yes, I agree. Quality for an electron may be different than human quality.
I simply was giving Tuukka another word for what he was presenting since he requested an alternative term. Re-read his post that I was responding to and you may understand why I suggested the word anthropocentric. I was not making any categorical statement concerning MoQ. Cheers, Mark Sent laboriously from an iPhone, Mark On Mar 26, 2012, at 2:42 PM, ridgecoy...@gmail.com wrote: > Mark, > > Huh? > >> Hi Tuukka, >> I would use the term "anthropocentric". This means that the way we >> see things is the way they must be. While this can be seen as >> completely true, sometimes it is taken too far in my opinion. >> Mark > > My ears always perk up at the term because my philosophical mentor, George > Sessions, who introduced me to RMP, Gary Snyder and Ed Abbey and other > important influences in my life made his rep and wrote his masters on > "Anthropocentrism and the Environment". His thesis fascinated me then and > ever since. Anthropocentrism just means human centered. And i see it > definitely as NOT the way things really are, but the way humans see them, or > would like to see them. > > John > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
